Triple
T18142928
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | financial instability hypothesis |
E434305
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnLeverage |
P130614
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rising leverage increases systemic vulnerability |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rising leverage increases systemic vulnerability | Statement: [financial instability hypothesis, viewOnLeverage, rising leverage increases systemic vulnerability]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnLeverage Context triple: [financial instability hypothesis, viewOnLeverage, rising leverage increases systemic vulnerability]
-
A.
viewOnMoney
Indicates a person's attitude, beliefs, or perspective regarding money and financial matters.
-
B.
viewOnWealth
Indicates a person’s attitude, belief, or perspective regarding wealth and its importance or use.
-
C.
viewOnLogic
Indicates a relationship where one entity expresses or embodies a particular perspective, stance, or opinion about logic.
-
D.
viewOver
Indicates that one entity has a visual perspective overlooking or facing another entity, typically providing a vantage point onto it.
-
E.
viewIs
Indicates that one entity is a visual representation or perspective of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90aac308190801e2c57d8c5bfe5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4de0da3e081908732ed022f5eb90a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e43317d11c81908d1dc14921566b47 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e438f5ae2c8190b11dee46534fa5a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:29 a.m.