Triple
T18092332
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State of New Jersey v. Rubin Carter |
E433001
|
entity |
| Predicate | initialConviction |
P130401
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1967 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1967 | Statement: [State of New Jersey v. Rubin Carter, initialConviction, 1967]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: initialConviction Context triple: [State of New Jersey v. Rubin Carter, initialConviction, 1967]
-
A.
convictionStatusInOriginalTrial
Indicates whether an entity was found guilty or not guilty in the initial (original) court trial.
-
B.
convictedBy
Indicates that an authority, typically a court or judge, has formally found an entity guilty of a crime or offense.
-
C.
convictedOf
Indicates that a person or entity has been found guilty of committing a specified offense or crime through a formal legal process.
-
D.
hasFirstConviction
Indicates that an entity has received its first legal conviction for an offense.
-
E.
reasonForConviction
Indicates the specific offense or legal basis for which an individual was found guilty or convicted.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b907d05c819083cc3bd6021089e6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4dd1972a881908072990de0715547 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4330e1f2881908b2506d47c48736b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e438f5ae2c8190b11dee46534fa5a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:27 a.m.