Triple
T1807351
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | variational autoencoders |
E40250
|
entity |
| Predicate | useFor |
P98
|
FINISHED |
| Object | image generation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: image generation | Statement: [variational autoencoders, useFor, image generation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: useFor Context triple: [variational autoencoders, useFor, image generation]
-
A.
usedFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
-
B.
usedWith
Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
-
C.
usedOn
Indicates that one entity is applied to, operated on, or otherwise utilized in relation to another entity.
-
D.
usedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is employed, applied, or deployed in opposition to, or for the purpose of affecting, another entity.
-
E.
actualUse
Indicates that an entity is currently being used or utilized in practice, as opposed to being merely available, planned, or potential.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88643a3388190a612f2ebe1fb29e7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab694d75ac8190a4d61399c04b9fb9 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61d6b8ec8190a1597b2e44ea6534 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.