Triple

T1807344
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject variational autoencoders E40250 entity
Predicate useTechnique P3047 FINISHED
Object reparameterization trick LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reparameterization trick | Statement: [variational autoencoders, useTechnique, reparameterization trick]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: useTechnique
Context triple: [variational autoencoders, useTechnique, reparameterization trick]
  • A. hasTechnique chosen
    Indicates that an entity employs, utilizes, or is associated with a particular method, procedure, or technique.
  • B. toolUsed
    Indicates that an action or task is performed using a particular tool as the means or instrument.
  • C. artisticTechnique
    Indicates the method, style, or process used to create or execute an artistic work.
  • D. isTechnical
    Indicates that an entity possesses specialized technical knowledge, skills, or characteristics related to technology, engineering, or applied sciences.
  • E. technologicalFeature
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88643a3388190a612f2ebe1fb29e7 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab694d75ac8190a4d61399c04b9fb9 completed March 6, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61d6b8ec8190a1597b2e44ea6534 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.