Triple
T18064478
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CEACR |
E432260
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalNatureOfOpinions |
P25835
|
FINISHED |
| Object | authoritative but not legally binding on States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: authoritative but not legally binding on States | Statement: [CEACR, legalNatureOfOpinions, authoritative but not legally binding on States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalNatureOfOpinions Context triple: [CEACR, legalNatureOfOpinions, authoritative but not legally binding on States]
-
A.
legalOpinionsUsedIn
Indicates that certain legal opinions are referenced or relied upon within a particular legal case, document, or context.
-
B.
givesLegalOpinionTo
Indicates that one party provides a formal legal judgment, advice, or interpretation to another party.
-
C.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
-
D.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
-
E.
legalScope
chosen
Indicates the range, boundaries, or extent of authority, applicability, or effect that something has under a particular legal framework or rule.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9070cac81909fa9473fb1c3f1c7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4cce74a0c81908375e3100c7578b8 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3f90c652481908133a73106d78919 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:26 a.m.