Triple
T1795758
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anthropocene |
E39598
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusInICS |
P127
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not formally ratified as epoch name |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not formally ratified as epoch name | Statement: [Anthropocene, statusInICS, not formally ratified as epoch name]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInICS Context triple: [Anthropocene, statusInICS, not formally ratified as epoch name]
-
A.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
-
B.
status
chosen
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
-
C.
statusInLogic
Indicates the logical status or role an entity holds within a formal reasoning or inference context.
-
D.
CISStatus
Indicates the compliance or certification status of an entity with respect to CIS (Center for Internet Security) benchmarks or standards.
-
E.
coordinateStatus
Indicates that one entity’s status is aligned, synchronized, or made consistent with another entity’s status or with a shared reference state.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88632aa588190ba3978fde0db5bbd |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab61b6ea188190aab9fb839bf1e367 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61d2f7a8819090301f92d3e358c7 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.