Triple
T17938739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Udayana |
E448533
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalSchool |
P3629
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nyaya |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nyaya | Statement: [Udayana, philosophicalSchool, Nyaya]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nyaya Context triple: [Udayana, philosophicalSchool, Nyaya]
-
A.
Nyaya
chosen
Nyaya is an orthodox school of Indian philosophy best known for its rigorous system of logic, epistemology, and debate.
-
B.
Nyayakalika
Nyayakalika is a significant Sanskrit treatise on Nyaya (Indian logic and epistemology) composed by the 9th–10th century philosopher Jayanta Bhatta.
-
C.
Nyāyabindu
Nyāyabindu is a concise and influential treatise on Buddhist logic and epistemology, traditionally attributed to the Indian philosopher Dharmakīrti.
-
D.
Nyaya Sudha
Nyaya Sudha is a seminal commentary by the Dvaita philosopher Jayatirtha on Madhvacharya’s Anuvyakhyana, renowned for its rigorous exposition of Dvaita Vedanta logic and metaphysics.
-
E.
Nyayadhish
Nyayadhish was the chief judicial authority in the Maratha administration, responsible for overseeing legal matters and dispensing justice in the kingdom.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f79d14819095540856928f0e25 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4ad9455fc81908bf595f9ed42c624 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:21 a.m.