Triple

T179322
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kakutani fixed-point theorem E3648 entity
Predicate impliesExistenceOf P1661 FINISHED
Object fixed point of a correspondence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fixed point of a correspondence | Statement: [Kakutani fixed-point theorem, impliesExistenceOf, fixed point of a correspondence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impliesExistenceOf
Context triple: [Kakutani fixed-point theorem, impliesExistenceOf, fixed point of a correspondence]
  • A. implies chosen
    Indicates that the truth of one statement guarantees or leads logically to the truth of another statement.
  • B. providedFor
    Indicates that one entity supplies, furnishes, or makes something available to or on behalf of another entity for its use or benefit.
  • C. doesNotImply
    Indicates that the truth of one statement or condition does not guarantee or lead to the truth of another statement or condition.
  • D. assumes
    Indicates that one entity takes on, accepts, or presumes a role, responsibility, state, or fact regarding another entity or situation.
  • E. providesEvidenceFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25374990081909766d30c79a18e0e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25900709c8190a65e778936be5dd5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2566b53d481909c0ed40dd3719e8c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:39 a.m.