Triple

T17829633
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prasat Suor Prat E445215 entity
Predicate subjectToConservation P15825 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Prasat Suor Prat, subjectToConservation, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectToConservation
Context triple: [Prasat Suor Prat, subjectToConservation, true]
  • A. hasConservationConcernIn
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified conservation concern status within a particular geographic area or jurisdiction.
  • B. typeOfConservation
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conservation practice, method, or approach that applies to an entity or situation.
  • C. conservationObligation chosen
    Indicates a duty or responsibility to protect, preserve, or sustainably manage a resource, environment, or entity.
  • D. conservationListedBy
    Indicates that an entity is recognized or recorded as a conservation concern by a specific authority, organization, or listing body.
  • E. conservationDependent
    Indicates that the continued existence or status of one entity depends on specific conservation actions or protective measures being maintained.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f1a6d881909f024bc603111cdb completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4891696cc819092ee6db7c4a6fae1 completed April 19, 2026, 7:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3d8e266888190ae976b4b7d5b886f completed April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.