Triple
T17826839
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zabierzów |
E445139
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Zabierzów |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Zabierzów | Statement: [Zabierzów, partOf, Gmina Zabierzów]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Zabierzów Context triple: [Zabierzów, partOf, Gmina Zabierzów]
-
A.
Gmina Zabłudów
Gmina Zabłudów is an administrative rural municipality in northeastern Poland, situated within the Podlaskie Voivodeship and centered around the town of Zabłudów.
-
B.
Gmina Zawichost
Gmina Zawichost is a rural administrative district in south-eastern Poland, centered on the historic town of Zawichost in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Zawoja
Gmina Zawoja is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, known for encompassing parts of the Beskid Mountains and serving as a base for tourism around Babia Góra.
-
D.
Zabierzów
chosen
Zabierzów is a village in southern Poland that serves as the administrative seat of its rural commune near the city of Kraków.
-
E.
Gmina Zembrzyce
Gmina Zembrzyce is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f1a6d881909f024bc603111cdb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e48914e20481908883d1da194f446c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.