Triple

T17824716
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dyle River E445083 entity
Predicate hasTributary P415 FINISHED
Object Lasne River NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lasne River | Statement: [Dyle River, hasTributary, Lasne River]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lasne River
Context triple: [Dyle River, hasTributary, Lasne River]
  • A. Lasne River chosen
    The Lasne River is a small watercourse in central Belgium that flows through the Walloon Brabant region before joining the Dyle River.
  • B. Lorze River
    The Lorze River is a Swiss river in the canton of Zug, known for flowing through the Ägeri Valley and the Höllgrotten caves before joining the Reuss.
  • C. Lyp River
    The Lyp River is a watercourse that serves as a right-bank tributary within the Siva River drainage system.
  • D. Arpath River
    Arpath River is a mountain river in the Anantnag district of Jammu and Kashmir, India, known for its cold, clear waters fed by Himalayan glaciers and springs.
  • E. Ognon River
    The Ognon River is a waterway in eastern France that flows through the Bourgogne-Franche-Comté region before joining the Saône River.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f0de78819099395b14db75a8a6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4891352ac8190ad3d669fea1c9fbb completed April 19, 2026, 7:49 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.