Triple
T17819232
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mount Flora |
E444930
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsHypothesis |
P9427
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Antarctica once had a temperate climate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Antarctica once had a temperate climate | Statement: [Mount Flora, supportsHypothesis, Antarctica once had a temperate climate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsHypothesis Context triple: [Mount Flora, supportsHypothesis, Antarctica once had a temperate climate]
-
A.
supportsTheory
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
-
B.
hypothesis
Indicates that a statement or proposition is tentatively assumed to be true and is subject to testing, evaluation, or proof.
-
C.
proposesHypothesis
Indicates that one entity puts forward a tentative explanation or hypothesis for consideration regarding another entity or phenomenon.
-
D.
basisOfHypothesis
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational evidence, rationale, or starting point for formulating a particular hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
-
E.
confirmedTheoryOf
Indicates that one entity is recognized or established as the validated theoretical explanation or model of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f0de78819099395b14db75a8a6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e489101aa48190a1439d8cb683bba9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3d8de28688190844b65acf6af54e6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.