Triple
T17732286
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rip City |
E442615
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMottoLikeUse |
P33142
|
FINISHED |
| Object | support for the Portland Trail Blazers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: support for the Portland Trail Blazers | Statement: [Rip City, hasMottoLikeUse, support for the Portland Trail Blazers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMottoLikeUse Context triple: [Rip City, hasMottoLikeUse, support for the Portland Trail Blazers]
-
A.
usesMotto
Indicates that one entity adopts or employs a particular motto as its guiding phrase or slogan.
-
B.
hasMottoLikeFunction
chosen
Indicates that something serves a role or function similar to a motto, typically expressing a guiding principle, slogan, or core message.
-
C.
hasMottoInText
Indicates that an entity has a motto expressed in a specific textual form or wording.
-
D.
hasMottoContext
Indicates that an entity’s motto is associated with or applies within a specific contextual setting or scope.
-
E.
hasMottoDepiction
Indicates that something visually represents or depicts the motto associated with an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9ec79688190b86bdcef85a7b3aa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e478e7773081909dadb90ff5cb0906 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde815e08190881972e2d80d151e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:08 a.m.