Triple
T17730496
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Rancheria Act |
E442571
|
entity |
| Predicate | followedBy |
P78
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement | Statement: [California Rancheria Act, followedBy, Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement Context triple: [California Rancheria Act, followedBy, Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement]
-
A.
Tilton v. Beecher
Tilton v. Beecher was a highly publicized 19th-century American adultery trial in which journalist Theodore Tilton accused prominent preacher Henry Ward Beecher of having an affair with Tilton’s wife, Elizabeth.
-
B.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
-
C.
Wilkins v. Gaddy
Wilkins v. Gaddy is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying that the core inquiry in Eighth Amendment excessive force claims is the nature of the force used rather than the extent of the inmate’s injury.
-
D.
United States v. Harry F. Sinclair
United States v. Harry F. Sinclair was a landmark criminal case arising from the Teapot Dome scandal, in which oil magnate Harry F. Sinclair was prosecuted for contempt of Congress and jury tampering related to corrupt federal oil lease contracts in the 1920s.
-
E.
Leach v. Carlile
Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement Target entity description: The Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement was a landmark legal agreement that restored federal recognition and associated rights to several California Indian rancherias whose status had been terminated under mid-20th-century U.S. Indian policy.
-
A.
Tilton v. Beecher
Tilton v. Beecher was a highly publicized 19th-century American adultery trial in which journalist Theodore Tilton accused prominent preacher Henry Ward Beecher of having an affair with Tilton’s wife, Elizabeth.
-
B.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
-
C.
Wilkins v. Gaddy
Wilkins v. Gaddy is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying that the core inquiry in Eighth Amendment excessive force claims is the nature of the force used rather than the extent of the inmate’s injury.
-
D.
United States v. Harry F. Sinclair
United States v. Harry F. Sinclair was a landmark criminal case arising from the Teapot Dome scandal, in which oil magnate Harry F. Sinclair was prosecuted for contempt of Congress and jury tampering related to corrupt federal oil lease contracts in the 1920s.
-
E.
Leach v. Carlile
Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9ec79688190b86bdcef85a7b3aa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e478e5ba7c81908f8b06eb6859067f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:08 a.m.