Triple
T177239
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pioneer Football League |
E3598
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEligibilityRules |
P2846
|
FINISHED |
| Object | NCAA eligibility rules |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NCAA eligibility rules | Statement: [Pioneer Football League, hasEligibilityRules, NCAA eligibility rules]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEligibilityRules Context triple: [Pioneer Football League, hasEligibilityRules, NCAA eligibility rules]
-
A.
eligibility
Indicates that an entity meets the required conditions or qualifications to participate in, receive, or perform something.
-
B.
hasRule
chosen
Indicates that an entity is governed, constrained, or defined by a specific rule or set of rules.
-
C.
eligibilityCriteria
Indicates the conditions or requirements that must be satisfied for an entity to qualify for or be considered eligible for something.
-
D.
dropEligibleIndicatorSizeBits
Indicates whether an entity is eligible to be dropped, encoded as a bit-sized indicator value.
-
E.
hasLimitation
Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25374990081909766d30c79a18e0e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258fd278481908ad4498e03f38e2f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2566b53d481909c0ed40dd3719e8c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:39 a.m.