Triple

T17650742
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Exceptions and Regulations Clause E429481 entity
Predicate interpretedInCase P2252 FINISHED
Object Patchak v. Zinke NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Patchak v. Zinke | Statement: [Exceptions and Regulations Clause, interpretedInCase, Patchak v. Zinke]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Patchak v. Zinke
Context triple: [Exceptions and Regulations Clause, interpretedInCase, Patchak v. Zinke]
  • A. Chiafalo v. Washington
    Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
  • B. Zubik v. Burwell
    Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
  • C. Bucklew v. Precythe
    Bucklew v. Precythe is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Missouri’s method of execution against an Eighth Amendment challenge, clarifying the standards for inmates claiming that a particular execution protocol would cause them severe pain.
  • D. Trump v. Vance
    Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
  • E. National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning
    National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited the president’s power to make recess appointments under the Constitution’s Recess Appointments Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Patchak v. Zinke
Target entity description: Patchak v. Zinke is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed Congress’s power to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over pending lawsuits without violating the Constitution’s separation of powers.
  • A. Chiafalo v. Washington
    Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
  • B. Zubik v. Burwell
    Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
  • C. Bucklew v. Precythe
    Bucklew v. Precythe is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Missouri’s method of execution against an Eighth Amendment challenge, clarifying the standards for inmates claiming that a particular execution protocol would cause them severe pain.
  • D. Trump v. Vance
    Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
  • E. National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning
    National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited the president’s power to make recess appointments under the Constitution’s Recess Appointments Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e46e3d4948819084de72bed922be6e completed April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:05 a.m.