Triple

T17650694
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ex parte McCardle E429480 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object United States v. Klein NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Klein | Statement: [Ex parte McCardle, relatedCase, United States v. Klein]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Klein
Context triple: [Ex parte McCardle, relatedCase, United States v. Klein]
  • A. United States v. Eichman
    United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
  • B. United States v. Rabinowitz
    United States v. Rabinowitz is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed Fourth Amendment protections by upholding a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest.
  • C. United States v. Bajakajian
    United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
  • D. United States v. Classic
    United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
  • E. United States v. Basye
    United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Klein
Target entity description: United States v. Klein is an 1871 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s power to control federal court jurisdiction in a way that dictates judicial outcomes, reinforcing the separation of powers.
  • A. United States v. Eichman
    United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
  • B. United States v. Rabinowitz
    United States v. Rabinowitz is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed Fourth Amendment protections by upholding a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest.
  • C. United States v. Bajakajian
    United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
  • D. United States v. Classic
    United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
  • E. United States v. Basye
    United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e46e3d4948819084de72bed922be6e completed April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:05 a.m.