Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Ex parte Yerger | Statement: [Ex parte McCardle, relatedCase, Ex parte Yerger]

Target entity: Ex parte Yerger
Context triple: [Ex parte McCardle, relatedCase, Ex parte Yerger]

• A. Ex parte Yarbrough
  Ex parte Yarbrough is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to protect African American voting rights in federal elections against private interference and violence.
• B. Ex parte Garland
  Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
• C. Ex parte Siebold
  Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
• D. Ex parte Young
  Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
• E. Yates v. United States
  Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Ex parte Yerger
Target entity description: Ex parte Yerger is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s ability to strip the Court of jurisdiction and affirmed the Court’s power to review certain habeas corpus decisions.

• A. Ex parte Yarbrough
  Ex parte Yarbrough is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to protect African American voting rights in federal elections against private interference and violence.
• B. Ex parte Garland
  Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
• C. Ex parte Siebold
  Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
• D. Ex parte Young
  Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
• E. Yates v. United States
  Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
• F. None of above. chosen