Triple
T17650682
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ex parte McCardle |
E429480
|
entity |
| Predicate | petitionerAllegation |
P52031
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unlawful military detention during Reconstruction |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unlawful military detention during Reconstruction | Statement: [Ex parte McCardle, petitionerAllegation, unlawful military detention during Reconstruction]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: petitionerAllegation Context triple: [Ex parte McCardle, petitionerAllegation, unlawful military detention during Reconstruction]
-
A.
allegationByComplainant
Indicates that a specific allegation is made or asserted by the complainant against another party or situation.
-
B.
deniedAllegations
Indicates that one party has rejected or refuted specific accusations made against them.
-
C.
allegedAction
chosen
Indicates that an action is claimed or asserted to have occurred, typically without being proven or confirmed.
-
D.
petitioner
Indicates a relationship where one party formally requests a legal remedy or action from a court or authority.
-
E.
hasAllegationsOf
Indicates that one entity is accused or suspected of engaging in certain actions, behaviors, or misconduct, but without implying that these accusations are proven.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46e3d4948819084de72bed922be6e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cddc87188190ac2f049b86038676 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:05 a.m.