Triple

T1764061
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Worcester v. Georgia E38721 entity
Predicate subsequentControversy P4669 FINISHED
Object Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision
Georgia initially refused to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, exemplifying a major 19th-century conflict over federal authority and states’ rights.
E196858 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision | Statement: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision
Context triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
  • A. Georgia state courts
    Georgia state courts are the judicial branch of Georgia’s state government, responsible for interpreting state laws, resolving legal disputes, and administering justice within the state.
  • B. Supreme Court of Georgia
    The Supreme Court of Georgia is the highest appellate court in the U.S. state of Georgia, responsible for interpreting state law and the Georgia Constitution.
  • C. Gregg v. Georgia
    Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
  • D. Jackson v. Georgia
    Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • E. Court of Appeals of Georgia
    The Court of Appeals of Georgia is the intermediate appellate court in Georgia’s state judiciary, responsible for reviewing decisions from lower trial courts in most civil and criminal cases.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision
Triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
Generated description
Georgia initially refused to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, exemplifying a major 19th-century conflict over federal authority and states’ rights.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision
Target entity description: Georgia initially refused to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, exemplifying a major 19th-century conflict over federal authority and states’ rights.
  • A. Georgia state courts
    Georgia state courts are the judicial branch of Georgia’s state government, responsible for interpreting state laws, resolving legal disputes, and administering justice within the state.
  • B. Supreme Court of Georgia
    The Supreme Court of Georgia is the highest appellate court in the U.S. state of Georgia, responsible for interpreting state law and the Georgia Constitution.
  • C. Gregg v. Georgia
    Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
  • D. Jackson v. Georgia
    Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • E. Court of Appeals of Georgia
    The Court of Appeals of Georgia is the intermediate appellate court in Georgia’s state judiciary, responsible for reviewing decisions from lower trial courts in most civil and criminal cases.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentControversy
Context triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
  • A. controversy
    Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
  • B. subsequentConflict chosen
    Indicates that one conflict occurs after and is temporally subsequent to another conflict.
  • C. locationOfControversy
    Indicates the place or setting where a dispute, debate, or controversy occurs or is centered.
  • D. contestedBy
    Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
  • E. roleInControversy
    Indicates the specific part, involvement, or function an entity has within a particular controversy or disputed situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8862d562481908d7025a1c1f67c0d completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab173936b4819097332ee185996bbd completed March 6, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ada0f12fd8819099759ebcdfc19494 completed March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69ada1e3587c8190bca329c68ff31c41 completed March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69ada2977bfc8190ad028e17184fccaa completed March 8, 2026, 4:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61c9e06c819085489e00cfe72153 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:31 p.m.