Triple
T1764061
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Worcester v. Georgia |
E38721
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentControversy |
P4669
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision
Georgia initially refused to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, exemplifying a major 19th-century conflict over federal authority and states’ rights.
|
E196858
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision | Statement: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision Context triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
-
A.
Georgia state courts
Georgia state courts are the judicial branch of Georgia’s state government, responsible for interpreting state laws, resolving legal disputes, and administering justice within the state.
-
B.
Supreme Court of Georgia
The Supreme Court of Georgia is the highest appellate court in the U.S. state of Georgia, responsible for interpreting state law and the Georgia Constitution.
-
C.
Gregg v. Georgia
Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
-
D.
Jackson v. Georgia
Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
-
E.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
The Court of Appeals of Georgia is the intermediate appellate court in Georgia’s state judiciary, responsible for reviewing decisions from lower trial courts in most civil and criminal cases.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision Triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
Generated description
Georgia initially refused to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, exemplifying a major 19th-century conflict over federal authority and states’ rights.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision Target entity description: Georgia initially refused to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, exemplifying a major 19th-century conflict over federal authority and states’ rights.
-
A.
Georgia state courts
Georgia state courts are the judicial branch of Georgia’s state government, responsible for interpreting state laws, resolving legal disputes, and administering justice within the state.
-
B.
Supreme Court of Georgia
The Supreme Court of Georgia is the highest appellate court in the U.S. state of Georgia, responsible for interpreting state law and the Georgia Constitution.
-
C.
Gregg v. Georgia
Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
-
D.
Jackson v. Georgia
Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
-
E.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
The Court of Appeals of Georgia is the intermediate appellate court in Georgia’s state judiciary, responsible for reviewing decisions from lower trial courts in most civil and criminal cases.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentControversy Context triple: [Worcester v. Georgia, subsequentControversy, Georgia initially refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision]
-
A.
controversy
Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
-
B.
subsequentConflict
chosen
Indicates that one conflict occurs after and is temporally subsequent to another conflict.
-
C.
locationOfControversy
Indicates the place or setting where a dispute, debate, or controversy occurs or is centered.
-
D.
contestedBy
Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
-
E.
roleInControversy
Indicates the specific part, involvement, or function an entity has within a particular controversy or disputed situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862d562481908d7025a1c1f67c0d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab173936b4819097332ee185996bbd |
completed | March 6, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ada0f12fd8819099759ebcdfc19494 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ada1e3587c8190bca329c68ff31c41 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ada2977bfc8190ad028e17184fccaa |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61c9e06c819085489e00cfe72153 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:31 p.m.