Triple

T17593114
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bell V-280 Valor E428493 entity
Predicate demonstratorType P128140 FINISHED
Object technology demonstrator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: technology demonstrator | Statement: [Bell V-280 Valor, demonstratorType, technology demonstrator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: demonstratorType
Context triple: [Bell V-280 Valor, demonstratorType, technology demonstrator]
  • A. introducedAsDemonstrator
    Indicates that one entity is presented or identified to another entity specifically in the role of a demonstrator.
  • B. hasTypeOfDemonstration
    Indicates that an event or action is characterized by a specific kind or category of demonstration.
  • C. demonstratedBy
    Indicates that something is shown, proven, or made evident through the actions, behavior, or example of a particular entity.
  • D. demonstratedOn
    Indicates that an action, behavior, or property is shown, illustrated, or proven using a particular entity as the example or subject.
  • E. demonstratedConcept
    Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e1030481909950e140c63255b9 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e469e89acc81908e52138ad4f452c6 completed April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4fff0348190b899a32da537eaca completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3bbb50b448190a59dd4be33c76db7 completed April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:51 a.m.