Triple
T17559613
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LAMP stack |
E427664
|
entity |
| Predicate | canRunInContainer |
P86355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [LAMP stack, canRunInContainer, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canRunInContainer Context triple: [LAMP stack, canRunInContainer, true]
-
A.
canRunOn
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating, executing, or functioning on another entity (such as a platform, system, or environment).
-
B.
supportsRootlessContainers
Indicates that an entity is capable of running or managing containers without requiring root (administrative) privileges.
-
C.
canBeDeployedUnder
Indicates that one entity is permitted or suitable to be deployed or operated under the conditions, context, or authority defined by another entity.
-
D.
canDeployWith
Indicates that one entity is compatible or allowed to be deployed together with another entity in the same environment or configuration.
-
E.
canDeployWithin
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the capability or permission to be deployed inside or within the scope, boundary, or environment defined by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e0385081908a04b66f4dd4bd0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4562573e48190a19f30fe915a5455 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4fb39948190a82a597c5bac5c57 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.