Triple
T1744000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gorgias |
E38295
|
entity |
| Predicate | positionOfSocratesOnRhetoric |
P4931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rhetoric is a form of flattery |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rhetoric is a form of flattery | Statement: [Gorgias, positionOfSocratesOnRhetoric, rhetoric is a form of flattery]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOfSocratesOnRhetoric Context triple: [Gorgias, positionOfSocratesOnRhetoric, rhetoric is a form of flattery]
-
A.
relationshipToSocrates
Indicates the specific familial, social, or conceptual connection that one entity has to Socrates.
-
B.
philosophicalPositionExpressed
chosen
Indicates that an entity articulates, endorses, or otherwise conveys a specific philosophical stance, view, or doctrine.
-
C.
positionOnTheology
Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that one entity holds regarding theological beliefs, doctrines, or issues.
-
D.
hasPhilosophicalRole
Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is associated with a specific role or function within a philosophical context or discourse.
-
E.
positionOnEthics
Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that an entity holds regarding ethical principles, issues, or practices.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862b01a48190ab47209063af82d9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab630e7d008190a8c673665d9672bb |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61c5a18481909bc49e0c54d64314 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:31 p.m.