Triple

T1741813
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Axis axis E38248 entity
Predicate iucnStatus P1339 FINISHED
Object Least Concern LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Least Concern | Statement: [Axis axis, iucnStatus, Least Concern]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: iucnStatus
Context triple: [Axis axis, iucnStatus, Least Concern]
  • A. conservationStatus chosen
    Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
  • B. IUCNStatusSystem
    Indicates the conservation status classification framework used to assign an IUCN threat category to a species or taxon.
  • C. areEndangeredIn
    Indicates that the entities are classified as endangered within a specified geographic area or jurisdiction.
  • D. ecologicalStatus
    Indicates the condition or health of an ecosystem or environment, often in terms of its quality, integrity, or degree of disturbance.
  • E. isFunctionallyExtinctInTheWild
    Indicates that the species no longer performs its ecological role in the wild because its population is too small, fragmented, or non-viable, even if some individuals still exist.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8862b01a48190ab47209063af82d9 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab3c2559ac8190905186406fcaccb9 completed March 6, 2026, 8:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61c4023c819099cbe439aefda71f completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.