Triple

T17415213
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Plaza Moreno E423470 entity
Predicate designedWithin P1578 FINISHED
Object La Plata planned city grid LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: La Plata planned city grid | Statement: [Plaza Moreno, designedWithin, La Plata planned city grid]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedWithin
Context triple: [Plaza Moreno, designedWithin, La Plata planned city grid]
  • A. designedIn chosen
    Indicates that something was created, planned, or conceived during a particular time period or at a specific location.
  • B. designedWith
    Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
  • C. isDesignedAs
    Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
  • D. designedArea
    Indicates that an area has been intentionally planned, shaped, or configured according to a specific design or purpose.
  • E. isDesignedFor
    Indicates that one entity has been created, planned, or optimized specifically to serve the needs, purposes, or use of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889d7d27c819088486ce3f0627fa1 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e44231e29881909695a33aab1d49a2 completed April 19, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b02e6cc88190986e85e64ce9383e completed April 18, 2026, 4:24 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:46 a.m.