Triple
T17400192
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fitzroy Region |
E423064
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsCatchment |
P113991
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fitzroy River catchment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fitzroy River catchment | Statement: [Fitzroy Region, containsCatchment, Fitzroy River catchment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsCatchment Context triple: [Fitzroy Region, containsCatchment, Fitzroy River catchment]
-
A.
isInCatchment
chosen
Indicates that one entity lies within the geographic or service area covered or served by another entity.
-
B.
hasCatchmentAuthority
Indicates that an entity holds official responsibility or authority over managing and regulating a particular catchment area.
-
C.
hasCatchmentArea
Indicates that a geographic or administrative unit serves as the area from which an entity (such as a facility or service) draws its users, resources, or influence.
-
D.
hasMajorTownInCatchment
Indicates that a catchment area includes at least one major town within its geographic or service coverage.
-
E.
hasUrbanCatchment
Indicates that an entity is associated with a catchment area that is characterized as urban.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d710288190bf0f4762801fefae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43ac0596481908c400916d5c1b971 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b02e6cc88190986e85e64ce9383e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:45 a.m.