Triple

T173725
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems E3531 entity
Predicate usesModel P2006 FINISHED
Object noisy communication channel LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: noisy communication channel | Statement: [Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems, usesModel, noisy communication channel]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesModel
Context triple: [Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems, usesModel, noisy communication channel]
  • A. usedOn
    Indicates that one entity is applied to, operated on, or otherwise utilized in relation to another entity.
  • B. model chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, example, or simulation of another entity or concept.
  • C. designerUsedSelfAsModel
    Indicates that the designer served as their own model when creating or showcasing the design.
  • D. usedWith
    Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
  • E. usesEquipment
    Indicates that an entity employs or operates a particular piece of equipment to perform an action or fulfill a function.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25374990081909766d30c79a18e0e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a258e1ec008190a89dd452f72574f4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a256689f908190afeb5ee82022a911 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:39 a.m.