Triple

T173721
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems E3531 entity
Predicate establishesConditionFor P986 FINISHED
Object perfect secrecy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: perfect secrecy | Statement: [Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems, establishesConditionFor, perfect secrecy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishesConditionFor
Context triple: [Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems, establishesConditionFor, perfect secrecy]
  • A. hasCondition
    Indicates that an entity possesses, experiences, or is affected by a particular condition or state.
  • B. establishes chosen
    Indicates that one entity initiates, creates, or formally sets up another entity, relationship, or state, often giving it official or recognized status.
  • C. providedFor
    Indicates that one entity supplies, furnishes, or makes something available to or on behalf of another entity for its use or benefit.
  • D. definedOn
    Indicates that something (such as a function, rule, or structure) is specified to apply or be valid over a particular domain, set, or context.
  • E. appliesAt
    Indicates that an action, rule, or condition is relevant to or in effect at a specific location, context, or point in time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25374990081909766d30c79a18e0e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a258e1ec008190a89dd452f72574f4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a256689f908190afeb5ee82022a911 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:39 a.m.