Triple

T1730921
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Sedgemoor E37807 entity
Predicate notableAftermath P1706 FINISHED
Object Bloody Assizes conducted by Judge Jeffreys LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bloody Assizes conducted by Judge Jeffreys | Statement: [Battle of Sedgemoor, notableAftermath, Bloody Assizes conducted by Judge Jeffreys]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableAftermath
Context triple: [Battle of Sedgemoor, notableAftermath, Bloody Assizes conducted by Judge Jeffreys]
  • A. notableDuring
    Indicates that something was especially prominent, active, or significant during a particular time period or event.
  • B. notableOutcome chosen
    Indicates that an action, event, or entity leads to or is associated with a significant, noteworthy result or consequence.
  • C. notableFor
    Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
  • D. notableRevival
    Indicates that something has undergone a significant or noteworthy revival, resurgence, or renewed prominence after a period of decline or inactivity.
  • E. notableAbsence
    Indicates that something or someone is conspicuously missing from a context where their presence would normally be expected or significant.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8861cc6ac8190ac0b2e31ccf62851 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab5c553e508190b0f511b05e07fa20 completed March 6, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61c25a648190892de94c997fb983 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.