Triple
T17265268
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jack R. Goldberg |
E419108
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableEvent |
P259
|
FINISHED |
| Object | U.S. Supreme Court decision in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) |
E54958
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. Supreme Court decision in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) | Statement: [Jack R. Goldberg, notableEvent, U.S. Supreme Court decision in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court decision in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) Context triple: [Jack R. Goldberg, notableEvent, U.S. Supreme Court decision in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970)]
-
A.
Goldberg v. Kelly
chosen
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
-
B.
Rostker v. Goldberg
Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
-
C.
Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
-
D.
United States v. Carolene Products Co.
United States v. Carolene Products Co. is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for its Footnote Four, which laid the groundwork for modern constitutional scrutiny of legislation affecting fundamental rights and discrete and insular minorities.
-
E.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d9ab108190b70edd8d17aa1204 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42f44ec7c81909a925fc8692b0a6c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:26 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a01794641648190a5db87ecb359c17a |
completed | May 11, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:40 a.m.