Triple

T17265255
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jack R. Goldberg E419108 entity
Predicate participantIn P149 FINISHED
Object Goldberg v. Kelly E54958 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Goldberg v. Kelly | Statement: [Jack R. Goldberg, participantIn, Goldberg v. Kelly]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goldberg v. Kelly
Context triple: [Jack R. Goldberg, participantIn, Goldberg v. Kelly]
  • A. Goldberg v. Kelly chosen
    Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
  • B. Rostker v. Goldberg
    Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
  • C. Corrigan v. Buckley
    Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
  • D. Gooding v. Wilson
    Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
  • E. Goldman v. United States
    Goldman v. United States is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld warrantless electronic eavesdropping based on a narrow, property-based interpretation of the Fourth Amendment, later limited by the Court’s shift to a privacy-based approach.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886d9ab108190b70edd8d17aa1204 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e42f44ec7c81909a925fc8692b0a6c completed April 19, 2026, 1:26 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a01794641648190a5db87ecb359c17a completed May 11, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:40 a.m.