Triple
T17240248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Monte Perdido Glacier |
E418472
|
entity |
| Predicate | scientificConcern |
P126514
|
FINISHED |
| Object | risk of disappearance within decades if warming continues |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: risk of disappearance within decades if warming continues | Statement: [Monte Perdido Glacier, scientificConcern, risk of disappearance within decades if warming continues]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scientificConcern Context triple: [Monte Perdido Glacier, scientificConcern, risk of disappearance within decades if warming continues]
-
A.
socialConcern
Indicates a relationship where an entity is concerned about, attentive to, or actively engaged with social issues, problems, or well-being.
-
B.
strategicConcernFor
Indicates a relationship where one entity considers another entity’s situation, actions, or outcomes important for its own long-term goals, risks, or strategic interests.
-
C.
raisedConcernAbout
Indicates that one entity has expressed worry, doubt, or objection regarding another entity or issue.
-
D.
concern
Indicates that one entity is about, relates to, or is of interest or importance to another entity.
-
E.
scientificConsensus
Indicates that there is broad agreement among qualified experts or authoritative sources that a particular claim, finding, or theory is valid.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d8e96081909870bff6c3d0bf09 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42e1f385c8190ae44e702923b6f66 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3832553ac819091aa917c84f755b6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3873f62108190966c4e741ebd548d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:39 a.m.