Triple
T17120252
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Florida Republican primary, 2008 |
E415443
|
entity |
| Predicate | involvedDebatesInState |
P126030
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Florida Republican primary, 2008, involvedDebatesInState, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: involvedDebatesInState Context triple: [Florida Republican primary, 2008, involvedDebatesInState, true]
-
A.
debatedWithin
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
-
B.
fieldOfDebate
Indicates that something is the subject or domain around which a debate or argumentative discussion is centered.
-
C.
debatedAs
Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
-
D.
constitutionalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, disputing, or interpreting the meaning, scope, or application of a constitution.
-
E.
hasDebatedPerson
Indicates that one person has engaged in a debate or formal argumentative discussion with another person.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d090cc8190a39cb94992586905 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3e8092b548190b45c1695be47edc2 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 8:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d6b1b988190a8d6b6fe78c35e59 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e37542d060819082aa73948eb8ebd4 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:36 a.m.