Triple
T1711960
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | S/MIME |
E37201
|
entity |
| Predicate | version |
P3286
|
FINISHED |
| Object | S/MIME v3.1 |
E37201
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: S/MIME v3.1 | Statement: [S/MIME, version, S/MIME v3.1]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: S/MIME v3.1 Context triple: [S/MIME, version, S/MIME v3.1]
-
A.
S/MIME
chosen
S/MIME is a widely used standard for secure email that provides encryption and digital signatures using public key cryptography.
-
B.
PKCS #7
PKCS #7 is a cryptographic standard that defines the syntax for digitally signing and encrypting data, forming the basis for formats like S/MIME and CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax).
-
C.
PGP
PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) is an encryption program that provides cryptographic privacy and authentication for data communication, most notably for securing emails and files.
-
D.
RFC 3447
RFC 3447 is an earlier IETF standard that specified the RSA Cryptography Standard (PKCS #1) before being superseded by RFC 8017.
-
E.
RFC 2104
RFC 2104 is the Internet standard document that defines the HMAC (Hash-based Message Authentication Code) algorithm used for data integrity and authentication in cryptographic protocols.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa6315afdc81908409435bb47e8ee0 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:16 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69adb5be1a2c819083b95d55c969b9d6 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.