Triple
T1709335
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Korean Empire |
E36940
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalSystemReform |
P4888
|
FINISHED |
| Object | modern legal codes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: modern legal codes | Statement: [Korean Empire, legalSystemReform, modern legal codes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalSystemReform Context triple: [Korean Empire, legalSystemReform, modern legal codes]
-
A.
legalSystem
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
B.
legalSystemFeature
Indicates a characteristic, rule, or structural element that forms part of a particular legal system.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
reform
chosen
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
-
E.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88617439c819094ffb5d16a0f6307 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab7521878c8190b9e7739b8c3fc705 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61bd46d48190915500d75a9d8e94 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.