Triple
T1707535
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GTMO |
E36903
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedBy |
P260
|
FINISHED |
| Object | U.S. military commissions system |
E60835
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. military commissions system | Statement: [GTMO, usedBy, U.S. military commissions system]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: U.S. military commissions system Context triple: [GTMO, usedBy, U.S. military commissions system]
-
A.
United States military commission
chosen
The United States military commission was a wartime military tribunal system used by the U.S. armed forces to try individuals, including enemy commanders, for alleged violations of the laws of war.
-
B.
court-martial of William Calley
The court-martial of William Calley was a highly publicized U.S. military trial in 1971 in which Army Lieutenant William Calley was convicted for his role in the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War.
-
C.
Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is an intermediate appellate military court that reviews courts-martial convictions of United States Air Force personnel for legal and factual sufficiency.
-
D.
opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
The opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that limited presidential wartime authority by ruling that the military commissions set up to try Guantánamo detainees violated U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions.
-
E.
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals is an intermediate appellate court within the U.S. military justice system that reviews courts-martial convictions of Army personnel for legal and factual sufficiency.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88617439c819094ffb5d16a0f6307 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa62f6fc9c8190b61cc9872cc2adc0 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:15 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad8ad849648190b2bb0e2a50cd6c75 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.