Triple

T17067371
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clayton Bigsby E414122 entity
Predicate fictionalDisability P125730 FINISHED
Object blindness LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: blindness | Statement: [Clayton Bigsby, fictionalDisability, blindness]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fictionalDisability
Context triple: [Clayton Bigsby, fictionalDisability, blindness]
  • A. fictionalUse
    Indicates that one entity makes use of another within a fictional or imaginary context, rather than in real-world usage.
  • B. fictionalizationOf
    Indicates that one entity is a fictional or dramatized representation, adaptation, or reimagining of another (typically real or earlier) entity or event.
  • C. fictionalAbilitySource
    Indicates that a fictional character’s abilities originate from, or are powered by, a specified source.
  • D. fictionalFocus
    Indicates that the primary emphasis or attention within a context is placed on fictional content, elements, or aspects.
  • E. fictionalField
    Indicates that the subject is associated with a fictional or imaginary field, domain, or area rather than a real-world one.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cde3d481908d4d01ba88ba7eb7 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3dbbddd708190a6192466b7dfd606 completed April 18, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d642f74819098c014135e249b27 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 completed April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:34 a.m.