Triple

T17048
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Puerto Rico E338 entity
Predicate languageFamily P1047 FINISHED
Object Romance languages LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Romance languages | Statement: [Puerto Rico, languageFamily, Romance languages]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageFamily
Context triple: [Puerto Rico, languageFamily, Romance languages]
  • A. nativeLanguage
    Indicates the language that a person or entity originally learned and uses as their primary or first language.
  • B. deFactoLanguage
    Indicates that a language is used in practice as the primary or common language in a context, even if it has no official legal status there.
  • C. languageOfWorkOrName
    Indicates the language in which a work is created or a name is expressed.
  • D. locale
    Indicates that one entity is the place, setting, or geographic area in which another entity exists, occurs, or is situated.
  • E. officialLanguage
    Indicates that a particular language has been formally designated by an authority as the official language used for government, legal, or administrative purposes in a given jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a241ea1ea081908e8a81ca97531ba5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a23fec1fe8819080da6f2c745dc8fd completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a241e933288190b02ef5369f7b8834 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.