Triple
T17047238
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Senate Select Committee on Ethics |
E413600
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubpoenaPower |
P125643
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Senate Select Committee on Ethics, hasSubpoenaPower, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubpoenaPower Context triple: [Senate Select Committee on Ethics, hasSubpoenaPower, true]
-
A.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
B.
hasLegalAuthorityFrom
Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
-
C.
hasLegalForceAs
Indicates that one thing possesses the binding legal effect or validity in the capacity or role of another specified thing.
-
D.
hasSupervisoryJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or body has the legal power to review, oversee, and, if necessary, correct or direct the actions or decisions of another authority or body.
-
E.
haveFiscalPowers
Indicates that an entity possesses legal authority or control over financial or budgetary matters.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cd18288190b006abab23f811b7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3da9f799c8190a683ae38cd990643 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:34 a.m.