Triple
T17046022
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Landsat 7 |
E413569
|
entity |
| Predicate | thermalBandResolution |
P25684
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 60 meters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 60 meters | Statement: [Landsat 7, thermalBandResolution, 60 meters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thermalBandResolution Context triple: [Landsat 7, thermalBandResolution, 60 meters]
-
A.
hasSpatialResolution
chosen
Indicates that something is characterized by a specific level of spatial detail or granularity at which it can represent or distinguish features in space.
-
B.
sensorResolution
Indicates the level of detail or precision with which a sensor can measure or distinguish changes in the observed quantity or environment.
-
C.
spectralResolution
Indicates the fineness with which a system can distinguish or separate different wavelengths or frequencies within a spectrum.
-
D.
samplingResolution
Indicates the level of detail or granularity at which data is sampled or measurements are taken in a process or system.
-
E.
thermalComplex
Indicates a relationship where entities are associated through a thermal interaction, structure, or system forming a combined thermal complex.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cd18288190b006abab23f811b7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3da9d7e988190a5e3991c7123f9b0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.