Triple
T1703640
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Via Appia |
E36820
|
entity |
| Predicate | builtUnderAuthorityOf |
P18538
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Roman censors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roman censors | Statement: [Via Appia, builtUnderAuthorityOf, Roman censors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: builtUnderAuthorityOf Context triple: [Via Appia, builtUnderAuthorityOf, Roman censors]
-
A.
hasLegalAuthorityFrom
Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
-
B.
usesAuthorityOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity exercises power, rights, or influence derived from or on behalf of another entity’s authority.
-
C.
legalAuthorityOver
Indicates that one entity has the recognized power or right to make, enforce, or adjudicate rules or decisions concerning another entity.
-
D.
legislatedUnder
Indicates that a law, regulation, or policy was created, enacted, or established according to the authority, framework, or provisions of a specific higher-level law or legal regime.
-
E.
legitimizedBy
Indicates that something gains legal, formal, or social validity as a result of the authority, action, or endorsement of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88617439c819094ffb5d16a0f6307 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab75ad24408190814069e6e3ef9e59 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61bad17c8190861b92cfb423f68f |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.