Triple
T170076
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 |
E3100
|
entity |
| Predicate | costSharingFormula |
P2310
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 90 percent federal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 90 percent federal | Statement: [Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, costSharingFormula, 90 percent federal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: costSharingFormula Context triple: [Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, costSharingFormula, 90 percent federal]
-
A.
keyFormula
chosen
Indicates that a formula serves as the primary or defining expression associated with an entity or relationship.
-
B.
recoversCostsVia
Indicates that one party regains or offsets its incurred costs through a specified mechanism, source, or intermediary.
-
C.
chargeOftenUsed
Indicates that an entity is frequently subjected to or associated with a particular charge (such as a legal, financial, or electrical charge).
-
D.
estimatedCost
Indicates the predicted or calculated monetary amount expected to be required for something, such as a project, item, or action.
-
E.
charge
Indicates that one entity formally accuses another of an offense or imposes a financial cost or obligation on them.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2524ce1e48190ab066bf72859f474 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25a3f9d188190aacf5791273e2c65 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25667717c8190bac5108366e2178d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:34 a.m.