Triple
T16997569
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oppenheim and Putnam |
E412356
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | philosophers of science |
C37667
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: philosophers of science Context triple: [Oppenheim and Putnam, instanceOf, philosophers of science]
-
A.
philosophy of science
Philosophy of science is the systematic study of the methods, foundations, assumptions, and implications of science, including how scientific knowledge is generated, justified, and evaluated.
-
B.
philosophy of science research institute
A philosophy of science research institute is an academic center dedicated to investigating the foundations, methods, and implications of scientific practice through rigorous philosophical analysis and interdisciplinary collaboration.
-
C.
history of science journal
A history of science journal is a scholarly periodical that publishes research articles, reviews, and essays examining the development of scientific ideas, practices, institutions, and their cultural contexts over time.
-
D.
positivist philosopher
A positivist philosopher is a thinker who maintains that genuine knowledge is derived exclusively from empirical observation, scientific methods, and logical analysis, rejecting metaphysics and unverifiable claims.
-
E.
question in history of science
A question in the history of science is an inquiry that examines how scientific ideas, practices, institutions, or technologies emerged, developed, and interacted with their broader historical and cultural contexts.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.