Triple
T16989
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Constitution |
E337
|
entity |
| Predicate | authorizes |
P273
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial review (interpreted by courts) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judicial review (interpreted by courts) | Statement: [United States Constitution, authorizes, judicial review (interpreted by courts)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorizes Context triple: [United States Constitution, authorizes, judicial review (interpreted by courts)]
-
A.
allows
chosen
Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
-
B.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
-
C.
administeredBy
Indicates that an action, service, or process is carried out, managed, or overseen by a specified agent or authority.
-
D.
issuedBy
Indicates that something (such as a document, order, or statement) has been formally created, authorized, or released by a particular agent or authority.
-
E.
advises
Indicates that one entity provides guidance, recommendations, or counsel to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a241ea1ea081908e8a81ca97531ba5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fec1fe8819080da6f2c745dc8fd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.