Triple
T16964151
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tulu script |
E411501
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedFor |
P98
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tulu language |
E86782
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tulu language | Statement: [Tulu script, usedFor, Tulu language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tulu language Context triple: [Tulu script, usedFor, Tulu language]
-
A.
Tulu
chosen
Tulu is a Dravidian language spoken primarily in the coastal regions of Karnataka and northern Kerala in southwestern India, known for its rich oral traditions and distinct cultural identity.
-
B.
Kurukh
Kurukh is an indigenous Dravidian language spoken primarily by the Oraon tribal communities in eastern and central India.
-
C.
Tharawal language
Tharawal language is an Australian Aboriginal language traditionally spoken by the Tharawal people of coastal New South Wales, south of Sydney.
-
D.
Coorg language
Coorg language is a Dravidian language spoken primarily in the Kodagu (Coorg) region of Karnataka, India, known for its distinct phonology and cultural significance to the Kodava people.
-
E.
Ganjami
Ganjami is a regional dialect of the Odia language spoken primarily in the Ganjam region of Odisha, India.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c9c9d481909afe222093641cae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d0a2cda88190bd574a869f0e43e9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:42 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00d46cb56481908c2bc6648a12fbcf |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:54 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.