Triple
T1694316
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Effie Gray |
E36620
|
entity |
| Predicate | screenplayCopyrightDisputeOutcome |
P31264
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Emma Thompson cleared of plagiarism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Emma Thompson cleared of plagiarism | Statement: [Effie Gray, screenplayCopyrightDisputeOutcome, Emma Thompson cleared of plagiarism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: screenplayCopyrightDisputeOutcome Context triple: [Effie Gray, screenplayCopyrightDisputeOutcome, Emma Thompson cleared of plagiarism]
-
A.
screenplayType
Indicates the specific category or format of a screenplay associated with a work or production.
-
B.
screenplayBy
Indicates that a film, television show, or similar work was written or scripted by a particular person or group.
-
C.
screenwriterOfWork
Indicates that a person served as the screenwriter (wrote the screenplay) for a particular creative work.
-
D.
mediaRights
Indicates that one entity holds legal permission or authority to use, distribute, or control the use of another entity’s media content.
-
E.
copyrightStatus
Indicates the legal protection state of a work, specifying whether and how it is covered by copyright.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886163dec8190859c514232a37a05 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf169da888190b3aa334752f1952b |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61b8ce348190b46154af0b041ff0 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aaf16865488190a76577b36760dc7a |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.