Triple
T16940426
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Geber |
E410934
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDisputedAuthorship |
P23974
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Latin works attributed to Geber |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin works attributed to Geber | Statement: [Geber, hasDisputedAuthorship, Latin works attributed to Geber]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisputedAuthorship Context triple: [Geber, hasDisputedAuthorship, Latin works attributed to Geber]
-
A.
hasDisputedStatusWith
Indicates that there is a contested or unresolved status, claim, or standing between the related entities.
-
B.
hasSongwriterCreditDispute
Indicates a relationship where there is a disagreement or conflict over who should be credited as the songwriter for a work.
-
C.
hasDisputedStatus
chosen
Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
-
D.
hasDissentAuthor
Indicates that a decision, opinion, or ruling has an associated author who wrote a dissenting opinion.
-
E.
hasDisputedClause
Indicates that a particular clause within an agreement or document is subject to disagreement, challenge, or contention between involved parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c886688190967be07322597ac9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3cfacdbc48190988ac259712bb9e8 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b9aa8748190b248890aca86753d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.