Triple
T16920044
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ares Vallis |
E410421
|
entity |
| Predicate | evidenceSuggests |
P3650
|
FINISHED |
| Object | past catastrophic floods with high discharge rates |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: past catastrophic floods with high discharge rates | Statement: [Ares Vallis, evidenceSuggests, past catastrophic floods with high discharge rates]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evidenceSuggests Context triple: [Ares Vallis, evidenceSuggests, past catastrophic floods with high discharge rates]
-
A.
providesEvidenceFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
B.
hasNoEvidenceOf
Indicates that there is no supporting proof, data, or documentation confirming the existence or occurrence of the referenced condition, event, or relationship.
-
C.
hasEvidentials
Indicates that a statement, claim, or information is accompanied by markers specifying the type or source of evidence supporting it.
-
D.
usedEvidenceType
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
E.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c7b1e481908c3766dfa8c13458 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3cded2f8481909a20cc08b47e922e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b982f548190b08414d55810de19 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:30 a.m.