Triple
T16918924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Czajowice |
E410391
|
entity |
| Predicate | gmina |
P852
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Jerzmanowice-Przeginia |
E402269
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Jerzmanowice-Przeginia | Statement: [Czajowice, gmina, Gmina Jerzmanowice-Przeginia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Jerzmanowice-Przeginia Context triple: [Czajowice, gmina, Gmina Jerzmanowice-Przeginia]
-
A.
Gmina Jerzmanowa
Gmina Jerzmanowa is a rural administrative district in southwestern Poland, located in the Lower Silesian Voivodeship.
-
B.
Jerzmanowice-Przeginia
chosen
Jerzmanowice-Przeginia is a rural administrative district (gmina) in southern Poland, situated in Lesser Poland Voivodeship near the city of Kraków.
-
C.
Gmina Zembrzyce
Gmina Zembrzyce is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Żegocina
Gmina Żegocina is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Żagań
Gmina Żagań is a rural administrative district in western Poland, centered around the town of Żagań in the Lubusz Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c7b1e481908c3766dfa8c13458 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3cdec3d0c8190994a0fca335c65d6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00c7c2c9cc8190b6d59d0a8edd078d |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:30 a.m.