Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Sykes–Picot Agreement | Statement: [Mark Sykes, coNegotiated, Sykes–Picot Agreement]

Target entity: Sykes–Picot Agreement
Context triple: [Mark Sykes, coNegotiated, Sykes–Picot Agreement]

• A. Sykes–Picot Agreement chosen
  The Sykes–Picot Agreement was a secret 1916 accord between Britain and France, with Russian assent, that planned the post–World War I partition of the Ottoman Empire’s Middle Eastern territories into spheres of influence.
• B. Hussein–McMahon Correspondence
  The Hussein–McMahon Correspondence was a series of letters exchanged during World War I between Sharif Hussein of Mecca and British High Commissioner Henry McMahon, in which Britain appeared to promise Arab independence in return for an Arab revolt against the Ottoman Empire.
• C. Sèvres Agreement
  The Sèvres Agreement was a 1920 post–World War I treaty that sought to partition the Ottoman Empire among the Allied powers, drastically reducing its territory and influence.
• D. Anglo-Persian Agreement of 1919
  The Anglo-Persian Agreement of 1919 was a controversial post–World War I treaty that sought to place Iran under extensive British political and economic influence, provoking strong nationalist opposition and ultimately failing to be ratified.
• E. Anglo-Transjordanian Treaty of 1928
  The Anglo-Transjordanian Treaty of 1928 was an agreement between Britain and the Emirate of Transjordan that formalized Transjordan’s semi-autonomous status under British oversight and laid groundwork for its eventual full independence.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: coNegotiated
Context triple: [Mark Sykes, coNegotiated, Sykes–Picot Agreement]

• A. negotiatesOver
  Indicates that one entity engages in discussion or bargaining with another entity concerning the terms, conditions, or details of a specific subject or item.
• B. negotiatedPursuantTo
  Indicates that a negotiation occurred in accordance with, or as required by, a specific agreement, rule, provision, or legal/contractual framework.
• C. negotiatedAfter
  Indicates that one negotiation event occurred later in time than another referenced event or negotiation.
• D. negotiatedVia
  Indicates that an agreement, deal, or arrangement was reached through the use of a specific intermediary, channel, or method of negotiation.
• E. negotiationAssociatedWith chosen
  Indicates a relationship where a negotiation is connected to, involves, or is conducted by a particular entity (such as a person, organization, or group).
• F. None of above.